Disagreement, equal weight and commutativity
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Equal-Weight Fingerprinting Codes
We consider binary fingerprinting codes that trace at least one of t pirates using the marking assumption. Ensembles of binary equal-weight codes are considered along with a new efficient decoding algorithm. The design substantially increases the code rates of the former fingerprinting constructions. In particular, for large t, the new tfingerprinting codes have code rate of t−2 ln 2 and identi...
متن کاملWhat Is the “ Equal Weight View ” ?
In this paper, we investigate various possible (Bayesian) precisifications of the (somewhat vague) statements of “the equal weight view” (EWV) that have appeared in the recent literature on disagreement. We will show that the renditions of (EWV) that immediately suggest themselves are untenable from a Bayesian point of view. In the end, we will propose some tenable (but not necessarily desirabl...
متن کاملWhat is the “Equal Weight View”?
Suppose two agents, S1 and S2, are epistemic peers regarding a proposition p: that is, suppose S1 and S2 are equally competent, equally impartial, and equally able to evaluate and assess the relevant evidence regarding p (we will call such propositions p peer-propositions for S1 and S2). After carefully reflecting on the salient evidence for p, suppose S1 and S2 discover that they disagree abou...
متن کاملMedial commutativity
It is shown that all the assumptions for symmetric monoidal categories flow out of a unifying principle involving natural isomorphisms of the type (A ∧B) ∧ (C ∧D) → (A ∧ C) ∧ (B ∧D), called medial commutativity. Medial commutativity in the presence of the unit object enables us to define associativity and commutativity natural isomorphisms. In particular, Mac Lane’s pentagonal and hexagonal coh...
متن کاملDisagreement and Information Collection
This note shows that disagreement, in the sense of differing priors, may increase the incentives to collect information when two agents work on a joint project. The reason is that each agent believes that new data will confirm his own beliefs and thus ‘convince’ the other agents to do what the focal agent thinks is right.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophical Studies
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0031-8116,1573-0883
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-009-9362-1